You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
perhaps we can just store the discriminant in the largest possible type since its type is already implicitly encoded in the repr and the typeset?
store the discriminant value in size-independent negabinary representation, since the discriminant type is already implicitly encoded in the repr and the typeset: Update discriminant value encoding #16
check if decl_macro feature is still necessary
check if generic_const_exprs feature can be eliminated or put behind a feature
bump MSRV to 1.83 at least to use const_mut_refs
we can be forward compatible so there is no rush to upgrade the MSRV right now
sync_unsafe_cell,exclusive_wrapper, maybecfg_target_has_atomicreplacenever_typefeature with the never say never hack!implsspecializationfeatureinhabitedness computation #11specializationfeature #17perhaps we can just store the discriminant in the largest possible type since its type is already implicitly encoded in the repr and the typeset?decl_macrofeature is still necessarygeneric_const_exprsfeature can be eliminated or put behind a featurebump MSRV to 1.83 at least to useconst_mut_refs