Receiver-less operation #1742
Replies: 6 comments
-
|
You need to bypass this in the firmware. INAV does not support receiver-less operation. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for the info! I will do so, but will keep failsafe active for low battery and RTH action and just deactivate valid pulse rating initiating any failsafe and will then compile my own iNAV-RLO version. (RLO=receiver less operation....),+++ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
If you manage to make it user-friendly and reliable - please consider submitting a PR into this repo - "RLO" would certainly be a great addition to INAV. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
+1 , RLO is usual in researchers' workflow. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@jstremmler how do you send command to 3DR-radio? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think RLO Could be very dangerous isn't it? I'd recommend using a receiver mod for bigger range or at least any kind of transmitter station that sends a valid signal out to the copter (without the need to control it manually) to have a physical range limitation here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I own a copter which from now on I only want to operate with a 3DR-radio and the existing SPRACINGF3 FC.
How do I avoid failsafe kicking in because I am always outside valid pulse range setting because I don't have any receiver on the copter?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions