-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Open
Description
Studying the property sto:relatedTo I found out that according to the resources where the relations themselve are described (wiki, dbpedia, official pages), relations can be of very different types. Below you can find the list of relation that were identified manualy:
sto:IEC_61499 isBasedOn sto:IEC_61131
sto:IEC_62264 isBasedOn sto:ISA-95
sto:W3C_OWL isBasedOn sto:W3C_RDF
sto:W3C_SPARQL isBasedOn sto:W3C_RDF
sto:IEC_61511 isSectorSpecificFor sto:IEC_61508 (sector - "process")
sto:IEC_62061 isSectorSpecificFor sto:IEC_61508 (sector - "manufacturing/machineries")
sto:IEC_61360 usesSameDatamodelAs sto:ISO_13584
sto:W3C_RIF isPartOf "the infrastructure for the semantic web"
sto:W3C_OWL isPartOf "the infrastructure for the semantic web"
In the STO, the property relatedTo is described as symmetric and transitive one but if we'll look at the identified relations, i.e. isBasedOn, we can see that this property is clearly not symmetric (sto:IEC_61499 isBasedOn sto:IEC_61131 is True but sto:IEC_61131 isBasedOn sto:IEC_61499 is False).
I believe that a more specific interpretation of the property sto:relatedTo can help us in constructing the landscape.
Reactions are currently unavailable