Skip to content

Specifying sto:relatedTo property #3

@mmaltsev

Description

@mmaltsev

Studying the property sto:relatedTo I found out that according to the resources where the relations themselve are described (wiki, dbpedia, official pages), relations can be of very different types. Below you can find the list of relation that were identified manualy:

sto:IEC_61499 isBasedOn sto:IEC_61131
sto:IEC_62264 isBasedOn sto:ISA-95
sto:W3C_OWL isBasedOn sto:W3C_RDF
sto:W3C_SPARQL isBasedOn sto:W3C_RDF

sto:IEC_61511 isSectorSpecificFor sto:IEC_61508 (sector - "process")
sto:IEC_62061 isSectorSpecificFor sto:IEC_61508 (sector - "manufacturing/machineries")
            
sto:IEC_61360 usesSameDatamodelAs sto:ISO_13584

sto:W3C_RIF isPartOf "the infrastructure for the semantic web"
sto:W3C_OWL isPartOf "the infrastructure for the semantic web"

In the STO, the property relatedTo is described as symmetric and transitive one but if we'll look at the identified relations, i.e. isBasedOn, we can see that this property is clearly not symmetric (sto:IEC_61499 isBasedOn sto:IEC_61131 is True but sto:IEC_61131 isBasedOn sto:IEC_61499 is False).

I believe that a more specific interpretation of the property sto:relatedTo can help us in constructing the landscape.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions