[Coverage Report] Test Coverage Report — 2026-08-29 #7845
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-09-05T04:39:29.710Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
📊 Test Coverage Report — 2026-08-29
Overall Coverage
Status: ✅ Excellent — All metrics exceed 85% threshold
🛡️ Security-Critical Path Status
src/squid/src/services/credentials/src/services/agent-volumes/src/services/agent-environment/src/bounded-execution/Key Finding: Squid proxy filter rules and credential isolation (api-proxy pass-through) are comprehensively tested. However, bounded-execution module (resource limits & finite disclosure) is severely under-tested.
📋 Coverage Table
✅ Fully Covered Modules (100%)
src/squid/src/squid/policy-rules/src/services/credentials/src/config/src/constants/src/types/src/microvm/src/cloud-hypervisor/src/logs/src/commands/src/parsers/src/services/agent-volumes/🔴 Low Coverage (<20%)
src/bounded-execution/🔧 Function Audit
Critical Security Functions — Status Check
Squid Domain ACL Enforcement (
src/squid/domain-acl.ts)Credential Isolation (
src/services/credentials/provider-credential-isolation.ts)Agent Volume Mounts (
src/services/agent-volumes/)/etc/shadowexclusion: 97.87% (hosts-file.ts)system-mounts.ts)credential-hiding.ts)Bounded Execution (
src/bounded-execution/finite-disclosure.ts) 🔴📅 Recent Source Changes (last 7 days)
Based on HTML coverage report timestamp (2026-08-29T04:34:45.632Z), this is the latest snapshot.
Expected active areas:
src/bounded-execution/(new feature)src/enclave/(unified enclaves rollout)src/microvm/(Cloud Hypervisor backend)🔎 Notable Findings
Squid ACL & Domain Filtering: Exceptionally well-tested. All domain-matching logic, policy rules, and HTTP/HTTPS decision trees have 100% coverage. Security-critical path for network isolation is highly validated.
Bounded Execution Gap:
src/bounded-execution/finite-disclosure.tshas only 0.78% branch coverage. This module likely handles resource timeouts and information disclosure limits — essential for AI agent sandboxing. Current tests do not exercise the core branches.Enclave Architecture:
src/enclave/at 89.57% coverage is reasonable but has 78.48% branch coverage. The MCP gateway integration (late-backend rediscovery) may need additional error-path testing.Microvm Cloudvisor Backend: 93.45% statement, 88.02% branch. Cloud Hypervisor launcher and VM lifecycle management could benefit from more error-case coverage (e.g., VM startup failures, resource exhaustion).
🎯 Recommendations
🔴 HIGH PRIORITY
Add unit tests for
src/bounded-execution/finite-disclosure.ts🟡 MEDIUM PRIORITY
Expand branch coverage in
src/microvm/rootfs.ts(current: 54.54%)Improve error-path testing in
src/enclave/runtime-preflight.ts(current: 41.02% branch)🟢 LOW PRIORITY
Increase config assembly validator coverage (
src/commands/validators/config-assembly.ts)Summary
Overall Assessment: The codebase has excellent test coverage (92.67%) with particularly strong coverage of security-critical networking and credential-isolation paths. However, the bounded-execution module is severely under-tested (16.46%), representing a coverage regression in a security-sensitive area. Prioritizing finite-disclosure tests and error paths in microvm/enclave modules will significantly improve reliability.
All reactions