ip rule management for RedHat completely different structure and approach

[igarny]

Expected Behavior

similar approach as with Debian ip rule management #226

Actual Behavior

https://github.com/example42/puppet-network/blob/master/templates/rule-RedHat.erb

Steps to Reproduce the Problem

Specifications

Please add this info:

1. Output of facter -p on the failing node (at least the OS related facts)
2. Version of Puppet and of the module
3. The relevant Puppet code and eventually Hiera data

[alvagante]

@igarny not sure on what you miss here, the ipv6 family support on RedHat based on the family parameter (and not eventually with ipv6 directly specified in the rule entry?)

[igarny]

All I'm stating is that both approaches for Debian and RedHat on ip rule management differ a lot, where it shouldn't. After all the implementation of the ip stack is very close in both flavors of Linux and the ip commands are the same.
Also there is a risk to continue to diverge, them by having people adding specifics for Debian in the respective templates.