Process completed with exit code 1.

Process completed with exit code 101.

this `continue` expression is redundant

Process completed with exit code 101.

this `continue` expression is redundant

Process completed with exit code 101.

this `continue` expression is redundant

Process completed with exit code 101.

this `continue` expression is redundant

module is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

implementation is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

struct is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `bon::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

this function contains a `self` parameter which likely means the builder attribute was used inside of an impl block; the impl block needs to be annotated with the #[bon] attribute and the builder attribute must be spelled as #[builder] without any additional path prefix, since it's used as a simple inert config attribute for #[bon] in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `bon::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `foo::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

there are no #[builder] functions in the impl block, so there is no need for a #[bon] attribute here

#[builder] attributes on the receiver are not supported

Unknown field: `attrs`. Available values: `crate`

module is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

implementation is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

struct is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `bon::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

this function contains a `self` parameter which likely means the builder attribute was used inside of an impl block; the impl block needs to be annotated with the #[bon] attribute and the builder attribute must be spelled as #[builder] without any additional path prefix, since it's used as a simple inert config attribute for #[bon] in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `bon::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `foo::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

there are no #[builder] functions in the impl block, so there is no need for a #[bon] attribute here

#[builder] attributes on the receiver are not supported

Unknown field: `attrs`. Available values: `crate`

module is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

implementation is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

struct is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `bon::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

this function contains a `self` parameter which likely means the builder attribute was used inside of an impl block; the impl block needs to be annotated with the #[bon] attribute and the builder attribute must be spelled as #[builder] without any additional path prefix, since it's used as a simple inert config attribute for #[bon] in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `bon::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `foo::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

there are no #[builder] functions in the impl block, so there is no need for a #[bon] attribute here

#[builder] attributes on the receiver are not supported

Unknown field: `attrs`. Available values: `crate`

module is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

implementation is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

struct is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `bon::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

this function contains a `self` parameter which likely means the builder attribute was used inside of an impl block; the impl block needs to be annotated with the #[bon] attribute and the builder attribute must be spelled as #[builder] without any additional path prefix, since it's used as a simple inert config attribute for #[bon] in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `bon::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `foo::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

there are no #[builder] functions in the impl block, so there is no need for a #[bon] attribute here

#[builder] attributes on the receiver are not supported

Unknown field: `attrs`. Available values: `crate`

module is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

implementation is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

struct is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `bon::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

this function contains a `self` parameter which likely means the builder attribute was used inside of an impl block; the impl block needs to be annotated with the #[bon] attribute and the builder attribute must be spelled as #[builder] without any additional path prefix, since it's used as a simple inert config attribute for #[bon] in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `bon::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `foo::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

there are no #[builder] functions in the impl block, so there is no need for a #[bon] attribute here

#[builder] attributes on the receiver are not supported

Unknown field: `attrs`. Available values: `crate`

module is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

implementation is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

struct is not supported in `trait`s or `impl`s

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `bon::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

this function contains a `self` parameter which likely means the builder attribute was used inside of an impl block; the impl block needs to be annotated with the #[bon] attribute and the builder attribute must be spelled as #[builder] without any additional path prefix, since it's used as a simple inert config attribute for #[bon] in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `bon::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

#[bon] macro found no #[builder] attributes in the impl block, but it looks like this attribute was meant for #[bon]; note that #[bon] expects a bare #[builder] attribute without the `foo::` prefix; #[builder] acts as a simple config attribute for the active #[bon] attribute in impl blocks; more info on inert vs active attributes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#active-and-inert-attributes

there are no #[builder] functions in the impl block, so there is no need for a #[bon] attribute here

#[builder] attributes on the receiver are not supported