Replies: 1 comment
|
I think this explains it Lines 1197 to 1203 in 12091af Can't speak on the C++ implementation, though it looks like they do it like this |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
when converted type is set but logical type is not, currently the logical type in basic type info will be none. I noticed that in C++ implementation logical type can be created from converted type, e.g., here. Is this behavior inconsistency intended?
All reactions