Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
100 lines (82 loc) · 4.67 KB

File metadata and controls

100 lines (82 loc) · 4.67 KB

Vulnerability Management Policy (Sanitized)

Document Owner: Security / Vulnerability Management
Approved By: [Senior Leadership / CISO] (simulation)
Effective Date: 2026-02-28
Version: 1.0
Status: Approved (simulation)


1. Purpose

This policy defines the minimum requirements to identify, assess, prioritize, remediate, and validate security vulnerabilities across the organization in a consistent and measurable way.

2. Scope

This policy applies to:

  • Servers, endpoints, and cloud assets managed by the organization (production and non-production)
  • Operating systems, applications, and third-party software installed on organizational assets
  • Systems owned or operated by internal teams and approved third parties where contractually applicable

3. Definitions

  • Vulnerability: A weakness that could be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability.
  • Authenticated Scan: A vulnerability scan performed with approved credentials to improve accuracy and coverage.
  • Asset Owner: The team or individual accountable for the system/service and remediation decisions.
  • CAB: Change Advisory Board (used to review/approve production-impacting changes).

4. Policy Statements

4.1 Governance and Roles

  • The Vulnerability Management function is responsible for scanning coordination, triage support, reporting, and tracking remediation outcomes.
  • Asset Owners are responsible for timely remediation or formally approved exceptions.
  • Infrastructure / Platform teams support patching, configuration hardening, and deployment changes.
  • Changes to production systems must follow change-control requirements (CAB where applicable).

4.2 Scanning Requirements

  • Vulnerability scanning must occur on a defined cadence:
    • External / Internet-facing assets: at least monthly
    • Internal assets: at least monthly (or per risk tier)
    • After major changes: re-scan required to validate security posture
  • Authenticated scans should be used whenever possible to reduce false positives and improve finding quality.
  • Scan credentials must be protected using least privilege and stored securely (e.g., secrets manager / vault).

4.3 Prioritization

Vulnerabilities are prioritized using:

  • Severity (e.g., Critical / High / Medium / Low)
  • Asset criticality (business impact tier)
  • Exploitability and exposure (internet-facing vs internal, known exploitation)
  • Compensating controls and operational constraints

4.4 Remediation SLAs (Default Targets)

Unless otherwise approved via exception:

  • Critical: remediate within 7 days
  • High: remediate within 30 days
  • Medium: remediate within 60 days
  • Low: remediate within 90 days

Note: These targets can be adjusted by leadership for specific environments. Any deviation must be documented as an exception.

4.5 Change Control

  • Remediation that impacts production availability, compatibility, or customer experience must follow change-control procedures (CAB review/approval).
  • All changes must include:
    • Implementation steps
    • Validation steps
    • Rollback steps
    • Owner and approver

4.6 Validation

  • Remediation is considered complete only after:
    • A successful re-scan verifies the vulnerability is resolved, or
    • The vulnerability is documented as a false positive with evidence and approved disposition
  • Evidence must be retained for audits and program metrics.

4.7 Exceptions (Risk Acceptance)

If remediation cannot be completed within SLA:

  • Asset Owner must submit an exception request including:
    • Business justification
    • Risk description
    • Compensating controls
    • Expiration date / review date (time-bound)
    • Approvals (Security + leadership)
  • Exceptions must be reviewed at least quarterly (or earlier if risk changes).

4.8 Reporting and Metrics

The program maintains ongoing reporting that includes:

  • Total findings by severity
  • SLA compliance (on-time vs overdue)
  • Mean Time To Remediate (MTTR)
  • Aging vulnerabilities (30/60/90+ day buckets)
  • Re-open rate (recurring issues)

5. Enforcement

Non-compliance may result in escalation to leadership and risk acceptance requirements. Repeated non-compliance may trigger additional controls, segmentation, or removal of systems from service until minimum standards are met.

6. References (Common Standards)

  • NIST SP 800-53 (Security and Privacy Controls)
  • NIST SP 800-40 (Guide to Enterprise Patch Management Planning)
  • CIS Controls (vulnerability management related safeguards)

Notes (Sanitization)

This document is intentionally sanitized for public portfolio use and omits internal system identifiers, IPs, hostnames, and proprietary process details.