mcp-saas-foundry should feel like a serious starter, not just a note dump. The repository needs to answer four questions clearly:
- What does a production-minded SaaS MCP server repo look like?
- Where do transport, provider adapters, and tool contracts live?
- What minimum operational and security rules should every starter inherit?
- How does a maintainer go from blueprint to publishable repository without improvising structure?
.
├── docs/
│ ├── blueprint.md
│ ├── checklist.md
│ └── roadmap.md
├── examples/
│ ├── github-issues/
│ └── internal-rest/
├── src/
│ ├── blueprint.mjs
│ └── plan.mjs
├── templates/
│ └── node-starter/
└── test/
└── blueprint.test.mjs
The starter should define architecture, release expectations, and implementation gates in markdown first. Teams need a shared definition of "starter quality" before adding SDK-specific code.
templates/node-starter/ is the handoff point from planning to execution. It should stay dependency-light, readable, and safe to fork. The template should include:
- config loading and env naming conventions
- a manifest or service description module
- provider adapter boundaries for upstream APIs
- tool modules with clear naming and input ownership
- smoke tests for starter invariants
Examples should not be full products. They should show how real surfaces map onto the starter:
- public SaaS with scopes, pagination, and user-facing tool names
- internal APIs with narrower blast radius and stronger governance notes
The root script should stay lightweight and dependency-free. Its job is to make the blueprint inspectable from the terminal, not to become a framework.
docs/owns architecture guidance, release stages, and definition-of-done content.templates/owns copyable starter files only.examples/owns adaptation patterns and sample tool catalogs.src/owns repo preview scripts and other lightweight helper logic.test/owns verification for root-level scripts and blueprint integrity.
Every starter derived from this repo should eventually include:
- explicit auth and scope handling rules
- tool names that reflect business nouns and actions
- pagination, rate-limit, and retry policies
- observability hooks for request tracing and support debugging
- release metadata, onboarding notes, and smoke tests
This repo should not try to be:
- a monolithic framework
- an SDK replacement
- a giant catalog of every SaaS connector pattern
- a dependency-heavy demo app
- Review this blueprint and remove any starter pieces you do not need.
- Fork or copy
templates/node-starter/into a new repository. - Pick the closest example under
examples/and map your real tool surface against it. - Use
docs/checklist.mdto harden the result before publishing.