Description of the bug
Currently, model/type references in other models/types receive the support.class scope which is totally wrong (because they are not something that a standard library provides. Prisma Schema Language doesn't have that concept). The reason I chose it was for the coloring of model/types to be different from standard scalar types (like Int, String etc.). Ideally, it should receive something like variable.other.model.prisma based on sublimehq/Packages#1861 but variable scopes are always colorless, so it's visually straining to distinguish them.
Steps to reproduce
Refer the syntax definition.
Expected behavior
Model/type references have variable.other.model scope. We could put some steps on tweaking the color scheme to color variable.other.model the same as support.class but that's an additional wall for some.
Actual behavior
Model/type references have support.class scope.
PrismaHighlight version
1.0.2
Description of the bug
Currently, model/type references in other models/types receive the
support.classscope which is totally wrong (because they are not something that a standard library provides. Prisma Schema Language doesn't have that concept). The reason I chose it was for the coloring of model/types to be different from standard scalar types (likeInt,Stringetc.). Ideally, it should receive something likevariable.other.model.prismabased on sublimehq/Packages#1861 butvariablescopes are always colorless, so it's visually straining to distinguish them.Steps to reproduce
Refer the syntax definition.
Expected behavior
Model/type references have
variable.other.modelscope. We could put some steps on tweaking the color scheme to colorvariable.other.modelthe same assupport.classbut that's an additional wall for some.Actual behavior
Model/type references have
support.classscope.PrismaHighlight version
1.0.2