Following user's request for the windef to work with the sequential data, we adopted your format of sequencing: '(1+2),(3+4)' and so on and made it a part of the openpiv.tools.MultiProcesser:
see here https://github.com/OpenPIV/openpiv-python/blob/e3b185987a729381655d341cc7b358796d846314/openpiv/tools.py#L407
we of course updated documentation - see here:
https://openpiv.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/windef.html
However, this might interfere with the Tk GUI part (not sure about it).
In any case, please run tests vs 0.24.0 and see if it makes sense to unify this code once in the library and not in the GUI. Of course, it can be just a meaningless work, cause we're still in beta and not finalized the formats.
Following user's request for the
windefto work with the sequential data, we adopted your format of sequencing: '(1+2),(3+4)' and so on and made it a part of theopenpiv.tools.MultiProcesser:see here https://github.com/OpenPIV/openpiv-python/blob/e3b185987a729381655d341cc7b358796d846314/openpiv/tools.py#L407
we of course updated documentation - see here:
https://openpiv.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/windef.html
However, this might interfere with the Tk GUI part (not sure about it).
In any case, please run tests vs 0.24.0 and see if it makes sense to unify this code once in the library and not in the GUI. Of course, it can be just a meaningless work, cause we're still in beta and not finalized the formats.