-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathsample-antigravity-cli.html
More file actions
696 lines (476 loc) · 50.9 KB
/
Copy pathsample-antigravity-cli.html
File metadata and controls
696 lines (476 loc) · 50.9 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
▄▀▀▄ Antigravity CLI 1.0.10
▀▀▀▀▀▀ luke.skywalker@mesastar
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ Gemini 3.1 Pro (Low)
▄▀▀ ▀▀▄ ~/Projects/MESA
▄▀▀ ▀▀▄
> /model
⎿ Model set to Gemini 3.1 Pro (Low)
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> what is my current mesa environment?
▸ Thought for 1s, 478 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Read(/Users/you/.gemini/antigravity-cli/mcp/mesa/mesa_env_info.json) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 3s, 278 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_env_info(MESA environment info) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 292 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
Here is the current state of your MESA environment:
• Status: Valid
• MESA Version: f12c70cf (git/unversioned)
• MESA Directory: /Users/you/Projects/MESA/mesa
• MESA SDK Root: /Applications/mesasdk
• Docs Version: latest
• Docs Source: local -> /Users/you/Projects/MESA/mesa/docs/source
• shmesa: /Users/you/Projects/MESA/mesa/scripts/shmesa/shmesa (optional; treat as best-effort)
• Window Capability: On-screen window OK (PGSTAR Display: /var/run/com.apple.launchd.SFFcjOXE6R/org.xquartz:0 )
• GYRE: Bundled (v8.1) at /Users/you/Projects/MESA/mesa/gyre
• Compiler: gfortran gcc version 15.2.0 (GCC)
• OpenMP Threads: 14 (Available CPU Cores: 14)
• Kernel Info: Darwin 25.5.0 arm64
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> I see. Now, i want to run a model of a star that is undergoing magnetic breaking and measure the age of a stellar cluster from gyrochronology. For
starters though, we will have a model that does not enable magnetic breaking. Particularly, i want you to build an initial project with a proper inlist
that has an initial mass of 0.8 solar mass. we want to run this model starting rom the pre-main sequence up to the point when the hydrogen mass fraction
in the core is less than 0.01.
▸ Thought for 1s, 470 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Read(/Users/you/.gemini/antigravity-cli/mcp/mesa/mesa_work_create.json)
● Read(/Users/you/.gemini/antigravity-cli/mcp/mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set.json) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 1s, 602 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_work_create(Create MESA work directory) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 4s, 455 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Read(/Users/you/.gemini/antigravity-cli/mcp/mesa/mesa_docs_option.json) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 4s, 275 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check MESA docs for option)
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check MESA docs for option) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 2s, 444 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set initial_mass=0.8)
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set create_pre_main_sequence_model=.true.)
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set xa_central_lower_limit_species(1)='h1')
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set xa_central_lower_limit(1)=0.01) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 1s, 531 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check MESA docs for option) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 6s, 367 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
I've successfully created the initial MESA project for your
0.8 M
odot
star model.
Here's a summary of the setup:
1. Workspace Creation: A new MESA work directory was provisioned at /Users/you/mesa-work/0.8M_model using the standard single-star baseline.
2. Inlist Configuration: I updated the inlist_project file to match your requirements:
• Initial mass: initial_mass = 0.8
• Start point: create_pre_main_sequence_model = .true.
• Stopping condition: Central hydrogen mass fraction dropping below 0.01.
• xa_central_lower_limit_species(1) = 'h1'
• xa_central_lower_limit(1) = 0.01
3. Magnetic Braking: This is disabled by default in standard MESA single-star inlists, so no further action was needed to turn it off.
Would you like me to go ahead and compile/run this model now?
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> The inlist is not complete yet. Lets set the initial composition of the star so that the initial helium mass fraction is 0.2485 and metalicity is
0.0134 with a initial mixture of 6. These settings should give us a star with solar metallicity and metal fractions according to those measured for the
Sun by Asplund et al. 2009.
▸ Thought for 5s, 390 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check MESA docs for option) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 4s, 359 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check MESA docs for option)
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check MESA docs for option) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 1s, 405 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set initial_zfracs=6)
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set initial_y=0.2485)
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set initial_z=0.0134) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 4s, 329 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
I have updated the inlist with the solar composition you requested:
• Initial Helium: initial_y = 0.2485
• Initial Metallicity: initial_z = 0.0134
• Mixture: initial_zfracs = 6 (which explicitly selects the Asplund et al. 2009 photospheric metal fractions).
Are there any other initial conditions or tracking settings you'd like to tweak before we run the simulation?
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> You shall set the rotation. To do this, we can releax a non-rotating model to a specific uniform rotation frequency at the ZAMS. We will relax the ZAMS
model in 15 steps to reach a velocity that is roughly 10 times the current surface rotation freq of the Sun. ZAMS here will be defined as the point where
95% of the total luminosity comes from nuclear reaction.
▸ Thought for 1s, 577 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search MESA docs for ZAMS rotation) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 422 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check MESA docs for option)
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check MESA docs for option) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 376 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search MESA docs for set_near_zams_omega) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 358 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check near_zams_relax_omega)
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check set_near_zams_omega) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 1s, 631 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check new_omega) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 4s, 377 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check relax_omega) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 418 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search relax_omega_steps) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 2s, 653 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check num_steps_to_relax_rotation)
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search MESA docs for set_near_zams_omega_steps) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 7s, 1.0k tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set Lnuc_div_L_zams_limit=0.95)
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set near_zams_relax_omega=.true.)
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set new_omega=2.86d-5)
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set num_steps_to_relax_rotation=15) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 4s, 343 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check change_rotation_flag) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 3s, 865 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
I have updated the inlist to implement the ZAMS rotation relaxation strategy you described. Here are the specific controls I've added:
• ZAMS Definition: I set Lnuc_div_L_zams_limit = 0.95 (so MESA defines ZAMS as the point where 95% of the total luminosity is from nuclear
reactions).
• Target Rotation Frequency: I set new_omega = 2.86d-5 (in rad/s), which is roughly 10 times the current solar equatorial rotation frequency (
Ω ≈ 2.86 × 10⁻⁶
odot
rad/s).
• Relaxation Trigger & Steps:
• near_zams_relax_omega = .true. (instructs MESA to wait until the near-ZAMS condition is met before applying the rotation).
• num_steps_to_relax_rotation = 15 (relaxes the non-rotating model to the target new_omega uniformly over 15 steps).
Your model is fully configured. Would you like me to start the run?
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> lets round the rotation frequency to be ~ pi*10^-5. For this simulation, we will set a uniform rotation through out the envolution by setting a very
large effective viscosity. Additionally, we want to use an opacity table that is consistent with Asplund et al. 2009. The atmospheric bounday conditions
will follow Eddington grey atmosphere with a varying opacity in the atmosphere that is consistent with the local temperature and pressure. You shall also
set the correpsonding output directory and set to write out a row in the history file every time step.
▸ Thought for 2s, 622 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search MESA docs for uniform rotation viscosity)
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check MESA docs for kappa_file_prefix)
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check MESA docs for which_atm_option) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 420 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search Eddington_grey)
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search Asplund opacity) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 425 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check kap_file_prefix) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 4s, 404 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check kap_lowT_prefix) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 6s, 465 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check atm_option) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 4s, 419 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check atm_T_tau_opacity) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 393 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check history_interval)
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check log_directory) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 7s, 531 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set new_omega=3.14159d-5)
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set set_uniform_am_nu_non_rot=.true.)
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set uniform_am_nu_non_rot=1d20)
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set kap_file_prefix='a09')
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set kap_lowT_prefix='lowT_fa05_a09p')
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set atm_option='T_tau')
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set atm_T_tau_relation='Eddington')
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set atm_T_tau_opacity='varying')
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set history_interval=1)
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set log_directory='LOGS_0.8M') (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 6s, 280 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
I have applied all the requested settings to your inlist_project . Here's a breakdown of the updates:
• Target Rotation Frequency: I changed new_omega to sim π × 10⁻⁵ rad/s ( 3.14159d-5 ).
• Uniform Rotation (Solid Body): I've set set_uniform_am_nu_non_rot = .true. and uniform_am_nu_non_rot = 1d20 to guarantee that the rotation
stays uniform throughout the star's evolution via a massive artificial viscosity.
• Opacity Tables (Asplund et al. 2009):
• kap_file_prefix = 'a09' for the high-temperature tables.
• kap_lowT_prefix = 'lowT_fa05_a09p' for the low-temperature tables.
• Atmospheric Boundary Conditions:
• atm_option = 'T_tau'
• atm_T_tau_relation = 'Eddington'
• atm_T_tau_opacity = 'varying' (this numerical integration ensures the opacity varies with local T and P throughout the atmosphere).
• Outputs:
• log_directory = 'LOGS_0.8M' sets your output directory.
• history_interval = 1 writes a row in the history file at every single time step.
Your inlist is fully set up with these new physics and I/O specifications. Are we ready to compile and run the simulation?
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> Double check the opacity table. We want to make sure it is consistent with AGSS09.
▸ Thought for 1s, 584 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search AGSS09 opacity) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 1s, 605 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check kap_Type2_file_prefix) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 419 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search Type2) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 6s, 447 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check kap_CO_prefix) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 6s, 417 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set kap_CO_prefix='a09_co') (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 6s, 435 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
I double-checked the opacity settings, and you made a great point. While I had set the Type 1 (high-T) and low-T tables to Asplund et al. 2009 ( a09
and a09p ), I needed to ensure the Type 2 opacities (used for C/O enhancement deep in the star) were also aligned.
I have just updated the inlist to explicitly include the Type 2 table for AGSS09:
• kap_CO_prefix = 'a09_co'
Your complete opacity setup is now rigorously consistent with Asplund et al. 2009 across all temperature and composition regimes:
1. High-T: kap_file_prefix = 'a09'
2. Low-T: kap_lowT_prefix = 'lowT_fa05_a09p'
3. Type 2 (C/O enhanced): kap_CO_prefix = 'a09_co'
Is there anything else you'd like me to review, or should we go ahead and fire up the run?
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> lets use the opacity table that is smoothened out by MESA rather than a09
▸ Thought for 2s, 737 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search smoothed opacity) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 4s, 348 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search oplib) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 447 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search smoothed) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 408 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search OP_a09) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 1s, 539 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
▸ Thought for 4s, 284 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Search(Search smooth in defaults) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 3s, 851 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
There are a couple of opacity tables built into MESA that might fit the description of "smoothened out" or improved over the standard a09 (OPAL)
tables:
1. oplib_agss09 : These are the Los Alamos OPLIB tables. They offer a significantly higher table density (1194 X,Z pairs vs 126 for OPAL), which
eliminates a lot of interpolation wiggles and provides a much "smoother" opacity profile.
2. OP_a09_nans_removed_by_hand : These are the Opacity Project (OP) tables for the AGSS09 mixture where the MESA team has literally gone in by hand
to remove NaNs/artifacts.
Did you mean the Los Alamos OPLIB tables ( oplib_agss09 ), or the hand-smoothed Opacity Project tables ( OP_a09_nans_removed_by_hand )? Let me know
and I'll update the inlist immediately!
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> use the hand-smoothed one.
▸ Thought for 5s, 337 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set kap_file_prefix='OP_a09_nans_removed_by_hand') (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 360 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
I've successfully updated the high-temperature opacity tables to use the hand-smoothed Opacity Project tables:
• kap_file_prefix = 'OP_a09_nans_removed_by_hand'
Your inlist is fully dialed in with the AGSS09 composition, solid-body ZAMS rotation relaxation, Eddington grey variable opacities in the atmosphere,
and the hand-smoothed OP tables.
Would you like me to compile the project (run ./mk ) and start the simulation now?
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> what is the current inlist setting?
▸ Thought for 4s, 316 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Read(/Users/you/mesa-work/0.8M_model/inlist_project) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 3s, 685 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set stop_near_zams=.false.)
● mesa/mesa_work_inlist_set(Set Zbase=0.0134) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 9s, 287 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
I checked the file and noticed two important things in the default template that I just fixed to match your goals:
1. The template had stop_near_zams = .true. . I changed this to .false. so the simulation won't terminate as soon as it hits ZAMS; instead, it
will continue all the way down to a core hydrogen mass fraction of 0.01 as you originally requested.
2. The template had Zbase = 0.02 . I updated this to Zbase = 0.0134 to match your initial_z , ensuring the Type 2 opacities blend correctly.
Here is the complete current configuration of your inlist_project file:
&star_job
! begin with a pre-main sequence model
create_pre_main_sequence_model = .true.
! save a model at the end of the run
save_model_when_terminate = .false.
save_model_filename = '15M_at_TAMS.mod'
! display on-screen plots
pgstar_flag = .true.
! Rotation options
near_zams_relax_omega = .true.
new_omega = 3.14159d-5
num_steps_to_relax_rotation = 15
! Composition options
initial_zfracs = 6
/
&eos
/
&kap
! kap options
use_Type2_opacities = .true.
Zbase = 0.0134
kap_file_prefix = 'OP_a09_nans_removed_by_hand'
kap_lowT_prefix = 'lowT_fa05_a09p'
kap_CO_prefix = 'a09_co'
/
&controls
! starting specifications
initial_mass = 0.8 ! in Msun units
initial_y = 0.2485
initial_z = 0.0134
! when to stop
Lnuc_div_L_zams_limit = 0.95
stop_near_zams = .false.
xa_central_lower_limit_species(1) = 'h1'
xa_central_lower_limit(1) = 0.01
! rotation
set_uniform_am_nu_non_rot = .true.
uniform_am_nu_non_rot = 1d20
! atmosphere
atm_option = 'T_tau'
atm_T_tau_relation = 'Eddington'
atm_T_tau_opacity = 'varying'
! output
history_interval = 1
log_directory = 'LOGS_0.8M'
! solver options
energy_eqn_option = 'dedt'
use_gold_tolerances = .true.
/
Does this look perfect, or should we compile ( ./mk ) and run ( ./rn ) the model?
Sources:
▸ billwolf.space
(ctrl+o to expand)
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> i want the mesa to do the live plotting for me. gie me a plot that plots the total angular momentum against the star age.
▸ Thought for 5s, 425 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search History_Track) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 376 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search total angular momentum) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 4s, 308 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Search(Search angular_momentum in history) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 347 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
▸ Thought for 6s, 423 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
▸ Thought for 4s, 277 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Bash(cp $MESA_DIR/star/defaults/history_columns.list /Users/you/mesa-work/0.8M_model/) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 402 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Read(/Users/you/mesa-work/0.8M_model/inlist_pgstar) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 1s, 586 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Bash(cp /Users/you/Projects/MESA/mesa/star/defaults/history_columns.list /Users/you/mesa-work/0.8M_model/history_columns.list) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 6s, 300 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Edit(/Users/you/mesa-work/0.8M_model/history_columns.list) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 1s, 506 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Edit(/Users/you/mesa-work/0.8M_model/inlist_pgstar) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 6s, 344 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
I've got the live plotting all set up for you!
Here is what I did to make it work:
1. Exposed the Data Column: MESA doesn't log the total angular momentum to the history file by default, so I copied over the default
history_columns.list to your workspace and uncommented the total_angular_momentum line.
2. Configured PGSTAR: I edited inlist_pgstar and added a History_Track1 window explicitly bound to the two columns you wanted:
• X-axis: star_age
• Y-axis: total_angular_momentum
When we start the run, MESA will spawn an interactive PGPLOT window plotting the angular momentum evolution (in addition to the default HR diagram
and internal T-Rho profiles).
Would you like me to start the compilation ( ./mk ) and run ( ./rn ) now?
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> you shall help me improve the plotting. make sure the axis scale, labels, etc are all set up properly for good visualization.
▸ Thought for 2s, 609 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_docs_option(Check History_Track1_title)
● mesa/mesa_docs_search(Search History_Track1) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 6s, 743 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Edit(/Users/you/mesa-work/0.8M_model/history_columns.list)
● Edit(/Users/you/mesa-work/0.8M_model/inlist_pgstar) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 6s, 298 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
I've enhanced the plotting configuration for a much better visualization experience!
Here is what I tweaked in your PGSTAR setup:
1. Logarithmic Y-Axis: Since angular momentum spans many orders of magnitude as the star evolves, I switched the y-axis to plot
log_total_angular_momentum instead of the raw linear value (and I made sure to uncomment this new column in your history_columns.list ).
2. Window Sizing: I matched the plot window size ( win_width = 8 ) and aspect ratio ( 0.75 ) to the other standard profiles so it sits nicely on your
screen.
3. Labels and Scaling: I added a proper title ( 'Angular Momentum Evolution' ) and bumped up the text scale ( txt_scale = 1.3 ) so the axis labels
and ticks are crisp and easy to read. MESA automatically scales the axis limits as the data points stream in.
The setup is now thoroughly complete. Shall we run ./mk to compile and ./rn to watch the star evolve?
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> lets compile and run
▸ Thought for 6s, 329 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Read(/Users/you/.gemini/antigravity-cli/mcp/mesa/mesa_run_start.json)
● Read(/Users/you/.gemini/antigravity-cli/mcp/mesa/mesa_env_shell.json) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 4s, 298 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_env_shell(Compile MESA project) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 1s, 473 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_env_shell(Make MESA project) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 4s, 279 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_run_start(Start MESA run) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 309 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
The project compiled successfully and the simulation is now running!
The run is detached and executing in the background. Because we enabled PGSTAR, you should see the live plot windows pop up on your screen
momentarily, including the custom history track plotting log_total_angular_momentum against star_age .
Let it run, and enjoy watching the angular momentum relaxation and evolution as the star approaches the main sequence! Let me know if you want me to
monitor the log status or set up any background triggers.
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> i dont see the screen popped up.
▸ Thought for 5s, 340 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_run_status(Check MESA run status) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 362 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Bash(tail -n 30 /Users/you/mesa-work/0.8M_model/mesa_run.log) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 4s, 346 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Bash(grep "History_Track1" /Users/you/Projects/MESA/mesa/star/defaults/pgstar.defaults) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 337 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● Edit(/Users/you/mesa-work/0.8M_model/inlist_pgstar) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 5s, 346 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
● mesa/mesa_run_start(Start MESA run) (ctrl+o to expand)
▸ Thought for 4s, 280 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
Ah, my apologies! I checked the run logs and found that the simulation immediately crashed because of a tiny typo I made in the PGSTAR configuration.
I wrote History_Track1_x_name instead of History_Track1_xname (without the underscore). MESA is quite strict about namelist spellings!
I've fixed those typos in inlist_pgstar and just relaunched the run. The PGSTAR windows should pop right up for you now.
Let me know if you see them successfully plotting!
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> yep. the screen popped up. looked like the angular momentum doesnt change after relaxation. why is that?
▸ Thought for 1s, 566 tokens
Prioritizing Tool Usage
That is exactly what we should expect! There are two main reasons for this, based directly on the physics we configured in the inlist_project :
1. No Magnetic Braking: As you specified at the very beginning ("for starters though, we will have a model that does not enable magnetic breaking"),
we have not yet turned on any magnetic wind torques. In real low-mass stars (like our
0.8 M
odot
model), magnetic braking is the primary mechanism that bleeds away angular momentum over billions of years (which is exactly what gyrochronology
relies on). Without it, there is no torque to slow the star down.
2. No Mass Loss (Winds): We didn't enable any standard stellar winds (like Reimers or Block). Without mass leaving the surface, there's no mass to
carry angular momentum away into space.
Since MESA conserves angular momentum internally, and we've forced the star to rotate as a rigid body ( uniform_am_nu_non_rot = 1d20 ), the total
angular momentum gets locked in immediately after the 15-step relaxation phase and will remain perfectly flat for the rest of the run.
When you're ready to actually measure cluster ages from gyrochronology, our next step will be to turn on the magnetic braking controls so we can
watch the angular momentum (and surface rotation rate) decay over time!
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
>
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
? for shortcuts Gemini 3.1 Pro (Low)