I think it would be best to rename the arbiter field on the bounty so it isn't confused with a Delphi arbiter. Additionally, I think if we're not going to make this field an array of address we should remove it. It's weird to have a +1 on the bounty that can only accept fulfillments. It should be expandable if anything.
I think it would be best to rename the arbiter field on the
bountyso it isn't confused with a Delphi arbiter. Additionally, I think if we're not going to make this field an array of address we should remove it. It's weird to have a +1 on the bounty that can only accept fulfillments. It should be expandable if anything.